Friday, December 08, 2006

Media and Violence

How has the media treated the Khairlanji killings and its aftermath, the ended in large scale mob violence in many parts of urban maharshtra. News of the Khairlanji killings had been circulating in informal channels of communications established by dalit organizations. The mainstream media was apparently so clued out of this network that they didn’t realize something was brewing. Add to this the inept handling by the state government of the situation. The home minister blamed naxalites, the ISI and just about anybody, but did zilch to bring the actual perpetrators to justice. Again, his ‘conspiracy theory’ comments received wide publicity in the mainstream media.
Now let us come to the second part of the story. Everyone was taken by surprise by the violence that has rocked maharashtra over the last one week. Media commentary has put it down to simmering dalit anger over the Khairlanji incident where 4 members of a dalit family were brutally murdered by upper caste villagers. The two women were sexually humiliated and raped. The spark was provided by the desecration of an Ambedkar statue in kanpur. The strange part is that while Kanpur remained calm Maharashtra burned.
According to commentary in the mainstream and alternative media the violence that rocked urban centres in Maharashtra was spontaneous and uncoordinated. The dalit leadership, as represented by the various factions of the Republican Party is hopelessly splintered and opportunistic. According to at least one commentator this episode marks the emergence of a new movement in Dalit politics. Enough has been said about the politics. I want to concentrate on one aspect, how the media represented the entire chain of events.
Although the incident happened in end September, the national media did not pick up the story for a month after it happened. So what happened in this period? News of the ry. When an Ambedkar statue was desecrated in Kanpur the consequences were felt in Maharashtra. Mobs went on the rampage. Two local trains were burned in Bombay apart from the Deccan Queen, the intercity exress that plies between Pune and Bombay. The visuals made for good sensational footage and in the best traditions of the media they made front-page news in the newspapers and breaking news on the TV channels.
But one thing intrigued me the most. It was a report that some television channels were repeatedly airing footage of the Ambedkar statue desecration in Kanpur. This footage played a crucial role in fanning sentiments among viewers that led to the violence. It got to a point where the police had to call up the channels and request them to stop showing the provocative visuals. At least one channel disregarded that request and repeatedly broadcast the offending story.
The role of the broadcast media and its use of visuals that had shock value potential and the ability to provoke a reaction needs to be looked at more closely. By repeatedly airing this particular footage, aided no doubt by in-your-face commentary from studio anchors, the media played a crucial role in a particular chain of events playing themselves out. It would be wrong to lay the blame entirely on the media’s doorstep. Tempers were already running high and all it needed was a spark to set if off. There are many courses along which the line of events from the Khairlanji killings through the statue desecration could have played out. It is not a certainty that this line would have led to the large scale mob violence that was witnessed. But the fact that it did take this turn aided by the mass media is interesting. Was this a result that was ‘inevitable’ or even ‘desirous’ given the cut-throat media environment. After all, what makes for more gripping TV viewing than violence?
Jean Baudrillard identified the spread and saturation of the mass media as a defining feature of the post modern society. The ability of the media to create and define a reality of its own is a crucial part of the post-modern society. What we witnessed in Maharashtra was an example of the media nudging events in the direction it wanted and thus creating a situation that justifies its own relevance.

Labels: , , , , , , ,

2 Comments:

Blogger Unknown said...

I see your point, being in baroda has been quite irritating I must say for the same reasons you have written about. FYI, there are 13 news channels here and six newspapers, need I say more. The most basic problem is something that Ruchi had sent a forward to all of us about, I see it everyday here. MOre and more ill-educated youngsters are being hired and indoctrinated into news channels, and editorial control is almost absent. These freshers are told to look for provocative, shoot provocative and take provocative bytes...the to top it all off, theres absolutelty no control. I'll give you an example, the Dargah demolition riots was a very deliberate planned riot with complete compliabce by the media.
The situation here is worse cause the newspapers are the same...except for times and express the others all report such junk that it boggles the mind. gimme a call sometime and we can talk...

12:47 pm  
Blogger scannerD said...

hey man, nice to read your post. I agree with you completely. Remember that dame who tried to teach us Marshall Mcluhan at ACJ, that lecture makes more sense to me now. The media juggernaut keeps getting bigger and fatter from all the junk news that gets generated. There was an incident in the north where TV reporters instigated a man to commit suicide for the sensational footage. They actually handed him kerosene and matches and said as soon as they got their visuals they would extinguish the fire. Needless to say, the guy died.
I think more than the people entering the media its something in the very nature of the media. Its where we are headed as a society where media and society become mirror images of each other and the lines between 'reality' and 'spectacle' get increasingly blurred.

8:25 am  

Post a Comment

<< Home